Cases 41 - 50 of 687
Moss v. Trent et al
as 7:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Tim Trent, Joshua Salmon, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Reed et al
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Stephanie Reed, Mary Jane Dolan, Ryan Zuidema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavalieri v. Boyers et al
as 7:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
David Edward Cavalieri
Defendant:
Ms. C. Shanks, A. David Robinson, Stacy Meinhard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Vere v. USA
as 1:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
David Edward De Vere
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Banks v. Warden of USP Lee
as 7:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Johnnie Edward Banks, Jr
Respondent:
Mrs. FNU Zook and Warden of USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Haug et al
as 7:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Burton
Defendant:
Kimberly Haug, James Loan, Daniel B. Odell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Perry et al
as 7:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Edward's, Jr. and Ronald Gene Edwards
Defendant:
Lane Perry, Officer Barker and Andrew Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Edward Demond Davis
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
