Cases 41 - 50 of 133
DeLaney v. Canfield et al
as 1:2019cv06729
Defendant:
E. Williams, A. Akinyombo, C.O. Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence DeLaney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Nassau County Correctional Facility
as 2:2019cv04074
Plaintiff:
Nassau County Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Jose Rodriguez, Nassau County Correctional Center, C.O. Barbara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Rosa v. Barr et al
as 6:2019cv06418
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Field Office Dir Thomas Feeley and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Wander Duran De La Rosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evangelista v. Decker et al
as 1:2019cv04694
Petitioner:
Louis Evangelista
Respondent:
Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary of DHS, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Chrisostome v. Field
as 1:2019cv01890
Respondent:
Leory Field
Petitioner:
Stephenson Chrisostome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Annucci et al
as 1:2019cv02493
Defendant:
Ms. Blacke, Anthony J. Annucci, Mr. Glover and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01000
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wright v. Fields Jr.
as 1:2019cv00576
Petitioner:
Ronald Wright
Respondent:
Supt. Leroy Fields Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Fields Jr.
as 1:2018cv12410
Petitioner:
Ronald Wright
Respondent:
Supt. Leroy Fields Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Booker v. NYSDOCCS et al
as 1:2018cv11979
Plaintiff:
Messiah Booker
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS, Leroy Fields and Fishkill C.F. Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
