Cases 41 - 50 of 285
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas, Gabriel Salascio and Gabriel Paul Salas
Defendant:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Lubbock County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, Chekota Parker, Bill De Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vara-Perez v. USA
as 5:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Jesus Gabriel Vara-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meyers v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Michael Meyers, Boogey Man, Gabriel Salas and others
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rios v. Lynn County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Lynn County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01110
Petitioner:
Gabriel Delgado
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01331
Petitioner:
Gabriel Reyes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Lynn County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2022cv00307
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Rios
Respondent:
Lynn County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
