Cases 41 - 50 of 228
Dones et al v. N.Y.C.D.O.C.S. Comm. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2017cv06038
Plaintiff:
Aramis Dones, David Weber, Robert Elliot and others
Defendant:
N.Y.C.D.O.C.S. Comm. John/Jane Doe, Kisa Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv04299
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Glenn S. Goord, Executive Officer Henry Lemons and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Goord et al
as 9:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Martin Diggs
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord, Joseph Bellnier, M. Guynup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Federal Government et al
as 1:2017cv03484
Plaintiff:
Glenn MacPherson Thomas
Defendant:
Federal Government, Federal Courts, Edgardo Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. New York City Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06183
Plaintiff:
Erik White
Defendant:
New York City Dept. of Corrections, Joseph Ponte, Clement Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Orange County Court et al
as 1:2016cv05686
Plaintiff:
Glenn Thomas
Defendant:
Orange County Court, W. Lahar and Lercerbo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Tillotson et al
as 1:2016cv05420
Plaintiff:
Rendell Robinson
Defendant:
Gerald Tillotson, Glenn J. Trombly, John H. Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siles v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv04610
Plaintiff:
Shana Glenn Siles
Defendant:
Orange County Jail and Asia Beams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. USA
as 6:2016cv06322
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Glenn Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crump v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02489
Plaintiff:
Reginald Crump
Defendant:
City of New York, Ponte and Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
