Cases 41 - 50 of 139
Moore v. Martin et al
as 3:2020cv03283
Defendant:
. Mayfield, Graham Correctional Center, . Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan W Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Wertz et al
as 1:2020cv01333
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center, Woodford County, IL States Attorney, Mason County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David M Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv03258
Defendant:
John Doe and Graham Corrections Facility Security
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Woodford County, IL Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center, Woodford County, IL Judge, Woodford County, IL States Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford-El v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv50254
Defendant:
City Of Elgin, Kane County, Cook County Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Antoni Ford-El
Trustee:
Scanning Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Woodford County, IL Jail et al
as 1:2020cv01265
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center, Woodford County, IL Jail and Mason County, IL Jail
Plaintiff:
David M Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Woodford County, IL Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00492
Plaintiff:
David M. Sturgeon
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center, Mason County, IL Jail and Woodford County, IL Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. IDOC et al
as 3:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Graham CC, IDOC and Lt. Payne
Plaintiff:
Warren G. Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sturgeon v. Warden - Graham Correctional Center
as 3:2020cv00491
Respondent:
Warden - Graham Correctional Center
Petitioner:
David M. Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Magee v. Thrush et al
as 1:2020cv01008
Plaintiff:
Victor Magee
Defendant:
. Myers, . Thrush, Justin Hammers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
