Cases 41 - 50 of 150
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Minor Adams, Mike Byrne and Jo Gentry
Plaintiff:
Francis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Jorge Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shields v. Baker et al
as 3:2018cv00031
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Dwayne Baze, Kelly Belanger and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houe v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv03093
Respondent:
Warden Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Raymond Houe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Bannister et al
as 2:2017cv03079
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Sonya Carrillo and Jo Gentry
Plaintiff:
Leroy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vignolo v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02976
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Jo Gentry and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Leonard D Vignolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fasthorse v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02833
Defendant:
Anderson, Dwayne Deal, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Lavern C Fasthorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02826
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv02711
Defendant:
Charge Nurse, Warden Gentry and NDOC Medical Director
Plaintiff:
Richard T Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carley v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02670
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Carley
Defendant:
Foster, Warden Jo Gentry, Tonya Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
