Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Gill v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pasco County)
as 8:2019cv01507
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Marvin C. Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv00240
Plaintiff:
Malik J. Taylor and Marquesha Taylor
Defendant:
J. Adams, Joshue Campbell, J. R. Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BARFIELD
as 5:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
BARFIELD, JULIE JONES, NEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00725
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ignacio Gill
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FENELUS v. GENT et al
as 3:2017cv00642
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FENELUS
Defendant:
B GENT, B LANE, C SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilles v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv22413
Plaintiff:
Fritz Gilles
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Edson v. McRae et al
as 0:2014cv62594
Plaintiff:
Steven August Edson
Defendant:
Victoria P. McRae, Jeannette G. Moran, Ernest Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00450
Petitioner:
Rhonda Gills
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONNELL v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2012cv00508
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALAN CONNELL
Defendant:
WALTER GIELOW, K GILL, FREDDIE DIXION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryals v. B.S.O.
as 0:2012cv60393
Plaintiff:
Julian Ryals
Defendant:
B.S.O., Officer Livingston, Officer Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
