Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00771
Petitioner:
James Murray
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vasquez v. U.N.I.C.O.R. Prison Industries Allenwood Low Facility et al
as 1:2012cv00597
Plaintiff:
Robertino Vasquez
Defendant:
U.N.I.C.O.R. Prison Industries Allenwood Low Facility, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peraza v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Paul Peraza
Defendant:
Thomas Cain, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David W. Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
George Keith Martin
Defendant:
Hamilton, Ramono, Lazano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRELL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
DARRELL HARRELL
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton-El v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv02354
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, D. Hudson, D. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Sutton-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daughtry v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv02210
Plaintiff:
Gil Daughtry
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDowell v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv02199
Plaintiff:
James McDowell
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fermin v. Federal Prison Industries UNICOR et al
as 1:2011cv01994
Plaintiff:
Juan Fermin
Defendant:
Federal Prison Industries UNICOR, G. Solomon, Sholly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
