Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Alfred v. Hinds County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
Chester Alfred
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Deputy Stewart, Deputy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQuirter v. Hinds County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2009cv00613
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee McQuirter
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriffs Department and Unknown Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Hinds County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Willis
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Department, Unknown Colbert, Unknown Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Hinds County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Fable Ronathan Adams
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff's Dept. and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Hinds County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2008cv00644
Plaintiff:
Fable Ronathan Adams
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Department and DA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cain v. Hinds County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2007cv00567
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lamar Cain
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Facility and Hinds County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
Virgil B. Cole, III
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Charles Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stern v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Hinds County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Hinds County Sheriff Department
as 3:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dominic Maurice Young
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
