Cases 41 - 50 of 1,387
Joseph v. Durgapersad et al
as 3:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Joseph
Defendant:
J. Durgapersad and G. Montegut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abebe v. Cox
as 1:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo-Shawn Abebe
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Callery v. Cox
as 1:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Kevin Callery
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abebe v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Unula Abebe
Respondent:
J. W. Cox and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. East Baton Rouge City Parish et al
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James and Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Foster v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Brent Thompson, Jessie Bellamy, Krystle Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guidry v. Hooper
as 6:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Miles Guidry and Miles J Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Bossier City et al
as 5:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
J Griffin
Defendant:
City of Bossier City, Jail of Bossier City and Bossier City Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney v. Hedgemon et al
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Steven Joseph Rodney
Defendant:
J Hedgemon, Assistant Warden Russell, Captain Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. 22nd District Attorney et al
as 2:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
22nd District Attorney, Warren Montgomery and Lewis Murry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
