Cases 41 - 50 of 956
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Frankhouse v. Harford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
John Byron Frankhouse
Defendant:
Harford County Detention Center and Deputy Jobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Emge v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2023cv02528
Plaintiff:
John Emge
Defendant:
DPSCS and Yes Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Doe
as 1:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Abraham Garcia Ramos
Defendant:
Dr. John/Jane Doe and Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
X. v. Yes Care Health et al
as 1:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Chris X.
Defendant:
Yes Care Health, Arresahegn Getachen, M.D., Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01896
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kidwell III v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Kidwell III
Defendant:
Thomas Lee, Richard Clayton, Tyler Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Falkenstein v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
John W. Falkenstein, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eric Owens
Defendant:
Warden Michael Bivens, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Deputy Warden Bos, Deputy Warden House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
