Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Charles Monroe v. Christopher Klein, et al
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff, MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer, BENSON, Staff and others
Robinson v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2012cv01401
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
James Scarborough, Troy Thompson, Argawal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2012cv01057
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
James Scarborough, Perry Phelps, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Runyon v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. RUNYON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, PERRY PHELPS, DAVID PIERCE and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Runyon v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Gill et al
as 1:2011cv01029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
George Gill, Michael Deppe and James Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
