Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Williams v. Prisoner Transport Services, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00261
Defendant:
U. S. Prisoner Transport, U.S. Corrections, LLC and Prisoner Transport Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Carman et al
as 3:2018cv00972
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., f/n/u Roach, Carroll Carman and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00973
Plaintiff:
Andre Phillips
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc. and Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. Prisoner Transportation Services, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00871
Defendant:
John Does #1-6, Jane Does #7-11 and Prisoner Transportation Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hai K. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cloyd v. Centurion Health Care et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cloyd and Timothy Wayne Cloyd
Defendant:
Georgia Crowell, M.D. Gayson, Kevin Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue v. American Paper Optics, LLC
as 2:2017cv02670
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue
Defendant:
American Paper Optics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01248
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Heard
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, Hau La and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Prisoner Transportation Services of America, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01249
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Ratliff
Defendant:
Prisoner Transportation Services of America, LLC and Three Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company et al
as 3:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company, Corizon, LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue v. American Paper Optics, LLC
as 3:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue
Defendant:
American Paper Optics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
