Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Harris et al v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02284
Plaintiff:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton et al v. State Bar of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Burton
Defendant:
State Bar of Georgia, Paula J. Frederick, John J. Shiptenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULLER v. KROGER
as 5:2012cv00082
Petitioner:
GABE LOCKETT CULLER
Respondent:
KROGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. WYNNE et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
KORENTHUS JERMAINE TAYLOR
Defendant:
APRIL M WYNNE, Willie E. Lockette and GEORGIA PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULLER v. BIBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 5:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
GABE LOCKETT CULLER
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, RIVER EDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER and GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURTON v. SATCHELL et al
as 1:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES BURTON
Defendant:
SANDRA SATCHELL, Willie E. Lockette and DAN HAGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. WYNNE et al
as 1:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES BURTON
Defendant:
APRIL WYNNE, Willie E. Lockette, REGINALD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULLER v. CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL
as 5:2011cv00493
Petitioner:
GABE LOCKETT CULLER
Respondent:
CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CULLER v. BIBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 5:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
GABE LOCKETT CULLER
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Lockette et al
as 1:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Brandon Leinord Ball
Defendant:
Willie E. Lockette, Brumby V Montgerand and Patricia Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
