Cases 41 - 50 of 234
ROBINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
ROYLIN JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
JESSE WILLIAMS, DUVAL, BERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers, Jr. v. Ayers et al
as 5:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Robert Conyers, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Ayers, Kathy Lane, Officer Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
David Lee Moore
Respondent:
Mark Inch, Lane, John Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUZIER v. OCASIO et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Petitioner:
JOSEPH JAY LUZIER, III
Defendant:
OFFICER OCASIO, SERGEANT LANE, SERGEANT WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayden v. Lane
as 5:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gayden v. Lane
as 8:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luzier v. Ocasio et al
as 6:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jay Luzier, III
Defendant:
Officer Ocasio, Sergeant Lane, Sergeant Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demps v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Jamal Demps
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Mr. Hodgeson, Clara Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv04821
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE MOORE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, LANE, JOHN DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01246
Petitioner:
Frederick Lane
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
