Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Lane v. Chester
as 5:2012cv00137
Petitioner:
Michael Brandon Lane
Respondent:
Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. Hauf et al
as 5:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
Chadwick J Neal
Defendant:
R B Hauf and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Hauf et al
as 5:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
Chadwick J Neal
Defendant:
H B Hauf, Lambert Construction Co, Payne County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. North Winds Living Center Inc et al
as 5:2010cv01356
Plaintiff:
Ross Lynn Lane
Defendant:
North Winds Living Center Inc, Kelly Jones, Teresa Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv01036
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Snider
Defendant:
United States of America, Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00822
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Snider
Defendant:
United States of America, Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery et al v. Edmondson et al
as 6:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Lowery, James E. Lane and Elco Q. Pierce
Defendant:
Drew Edmondson, Justin Jones, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Creek County Sheriff et al
as 4:2008cv00549
Plaintiff:
Cedric Norris
Defendant:
Creek County Sheriff and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berryman v. Coffman et al
as 4:2008cv00385
Plaintiff:
Billy Berryman
Defendant:
Donnie Coffman, S Adkins, Sharri Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caluyo v. Lopez et al
as 5:2008cv00514
Plaintiff:
Davin Caluyo and Davin Caluyo
Defendant:
Frank Lopez, Frank Lopez, John Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
