Cases 41 - 50 of 246
Stone #1 et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2020cv01326
Plaintiff:
Jane Stone #4, Jane Stone #3, Jane Stone #2 and others
Defendant:
Tanya Mitchell-Voyd, Jason Effman, Matthew Antolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Alexis Gendell, Asst. Warden La Spoulding, Sgt. D. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. USA
as 2:2020cv00131
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Elmer Alexander Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lopez v. 1st Def NYS Superintendent et al
as 2:2019cv06806
Defendant:
1st Def. NYS Superintendent and 2d Defendant New York St - Def NYS
Plaintiff:
Ligio Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez Pena v. Cole et al
as 1:2019cv10276
Defendant:
Jay Wineberg, David N. Keley, Terry Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Lopez Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Dennis et al
as 1:2019cv09276
Defendant:
Seurity Capt. Hernandez, Warden Sharma Dunbar, Cohall and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sidbury v. State of New York Dept of Corrections et al
as 9:2019cv01308
Defendant:
First Name Unknown Reyes, Department of Corrections, State of New York Dept of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Sidbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. People of State/Government et al
as 1:2019cv06273
Defendant:
Trump, People of State/Government, Kevin Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Geoviny Royalty Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez, Jr. v. Ambro et al
as 2:2019cv03596
Respondent:
Chief Clerk Frank Trope, Judge Richard Ambro and District Attorney Timothy Sini
Petitioner:
Jose H. Lopez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Keyser
as 1:2019cv02655
Respondent:
William Keyser
Petitioner:
Andrew Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
