Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Reginald M Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv02722
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Williams
Britton et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2010cv05647
Plaintiff:
Terry Britton, Richard B. Munns, Gabriel Holmes and others
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Bishop et al
as 2:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
Kirk Stevenson
Defendant:
J. Bishop, M. Williams and - Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lal v. McDonald et al
as 2:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
Azhar Lal
Defendant:
M. D. McDonald, D. L. Runnels, M. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowell v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
James E. Bowell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, High Desert State Prison, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Williams et al
as 2:2009cv03598
Plaintiff:
Ernest Miller
Defendant:
M. Williams and Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. Downing et al
as 2:2009cv03431
Plaintiff:
Marvin Glenn Hollis
Defendant:
M. S. Downing, C. L. Brewer, M. J. Rainey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nailing v. Fosterer et al
as 2:2009cv02475
Plaintiff:
Xavier Dmetri Nailing
Defendant:
B.D. Fosterer, K.D. Holman, P. Coughin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lee Pierce v. M. Williams
as 2:2009cv05503
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Pierce
Defendant:
M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Chatman v. Felker et al
as 2:2009cv01028
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
Tom Felker, M.D. McDonald, T. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
