Cases 41 - 50 of 255
Stockwell v. Miller-Stout
as 3:2013cv05435
Petitioner:
Dan Stockwell
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Adams et al
as 2:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
Quinton P Brown
Defendant:
Larry L Adams, Kerry Lawrence, Maggie Miller-Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Schimanskey v. Maggie Miller-Stout
as 13-35394
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOSEPH SCHIMANSKEY
Respondent - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT
George Bartz v. Maggie Miller-Stout, et al
as 13-35380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, INMATE BANKING AND MAILROOM STAFF, JANE DOES 1-15 and others
Bovan v. Brazington et al
as 2:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jamar Andre Bovan
Defendant:
Rita Brazington, Maggie Miller-Stout, Earl X Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warner et al
as 2:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Eldon Vail, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Juan Gomez Vasquez
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Hewson, Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Marlow, II v. State of Washington, et al
as 13-35176
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LEE MARLOW, II
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT
Berry v. Miller-Stout
as 3:2013cv05149
Petitioner:
Keith Berry
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Byrnes et al
as 2:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Donna Byrnes, Garvin, Rebecca Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
