Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Davis v. Warden of the MDC-Brooklyn
as 1:2014cv01159
Petitioner:
Alfredo Davis
Respondent:
Warden of the MDC-Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. MDC Brooklyn/US Marshals
as 1:2013cv04437
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn/US Marshals
Plaintiff:
Kyle Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv04438
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Doctors And Medical:
MDC Brooklyn
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Majdanski v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2013cv04402
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Majdanski
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn and Rosa Gersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen v. Warden MDC Brooklyn
as 1:2012cv04908
Petitioner:
John E. Chen
Respondent:
Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chen v. Warden MDC Brooklyn
as 1:2012cv04658
Petitioner:
John E. Chen
Respondent:
Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Santiago v. G.E.O Halfway House et al
as 1:2012cv01908
Plaintiff:
Samuel Santiago
Defendant:
G.E.O Halfway House, B.O.P., Pierre Leconte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santa v. Metropolitan Detention Center
as 11-4386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Guillermo Santa
Defendant - Appellee:
Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Doctor Williams and others
Jones v. United States Parole
as 11-3996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Parole, Fulwood, Director Mr. Fulwood Commission, Duke Terrell, Warden MDC Brooklyn and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
