Cases 41 - 50 of 176
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2010cv01714
Plaintiff:
KELVIN RAY LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, MICHELLE R. RICCI, IMAM SULUKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. RICCI et al
as 2:2010cv01315
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WATSON
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bienvenido Casilla v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 10-1654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BIENVENIDO CASILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ATTY GEN NJ
PRALL v. BOCCHINI et al
as 3:2010cv01228
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRALL v. BOCCHINI et al
as 1:2010cv01228
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, PHYLLIS OLIVER, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Baker v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 10-1655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE R. RICCI, ANN MILGRAM, BRUCE KAPLAN and others
JOSEPHS v. GOVERNER CHRIS CHRISTE et al
as 1:2010cv01071
Plaintiff:
HUGH G. JOSEPHS, JR.
Defendant:
GOVERNER CHRIS CHRISTE, NEW JERSEY STATE D.O.C., MS. MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alwyn Martin v. Michelle Ricci
as 10-1341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALWYN MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE R. RICCI, Admin.
JAMES v. RICCI et al
as 3:2010cv00649
Petitioner:
KHALIF JAMES
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ANN MILLGRAM, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMMONS v. RICCI et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Petitioner:
FREDERICK SIMMONS
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and PAULA TUMAYSHU DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
