Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Mitchell v. Fox et al
as 2:2012cv05150
Plaintiff:
Dale Mitchell
Defendant:
Spencer Fox, Michael Kerr, Jason Gaede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. State of Washington
as 2:2012cv01930
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Jackman et al
as 2:2012cv05142
Plaintiff:
Carlton James Mitchell
Defendant:
William Jackman, Sawyer, R Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2012cv05403
Plaintiff:
George O Mitchell
Defendant:
State of Washington, Kelly J Cunningham, Thomas Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. City of Tukwila et al
as 2:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bell, Sr
Defendant:
City of Tukwila, Tukwila Police Department, Richard Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gotcher v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2011cv00156
Petitioner:
Norman Gotcher, Jr
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Charles Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Diazon et al
as 2:2010cv02075
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
Diazon, David Oster and Elizabeth Bellmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. United States
as 2:2010cv01683
Petitioner:
Timothy Mitchell
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tracy v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv01443
Plaintiff:
Gerald B. Tracy
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle et al v. Tukwila Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv01182
Plaintiff:
James A Battle, Jr, Forrest Walker and Robert Baily
Defendant:
Tukwila Police Department, City of Tukwila, David Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
