Cases 41 - 50 of 230
Bowie v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Sharon Hampton, Lee Simon, Warden Timothy J. Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Eligha Bowie, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chapman v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 4:2020cv00216
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., James Cooksey, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Devon Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Knight v. Morris
as 1:2020cv00250
Respondent:
Superintendant of MSP Timothy Morris and Timothy Morris
Petitioner:
John Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ford v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 4:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
Darosky Derrell Ford
Defendant:
James Cooksey, Burl Cain, M.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jarvis v. Hall, in Official Capacity and Successor et al
as 4:2020cv00193
Defendant:
Unknown Cannon, in individual and official capacity, Pelicia Hall, in official capacity and successor, Unknown Muford, in individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Morris v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2020cv00297
Petitioner:
Jeffery Scott Morris
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mhoon v. Turner et al
as 4:2020cv00183
Plaintiff:
James Mhoon
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Lee Simon, M. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Forrest County Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Lt. Dale Bounds, Officer Harry Crockett, Forrest County Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morris Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Morris
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
Timothy Morris
Plaintiff:
Raymond Keith Thomas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Galloway v. Cain et al
as 1:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Timothy Morris and Burl Cain
Plaintiff:
Leslie Galloway, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
