Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Murphy v. Dickhaut
as 1:2010cv10491
Petitioner:
Kashmoni Murphy
Respondent:
Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Maine, State of
as 1:2010cv10245
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
Maine, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Murphy v. Maine, State of
as 1:2010cv10246
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
Maine, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. State of Maine et al
as 1:2010cv10167
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
State of Maine, Michaela Murphy, Norman Croteau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Baldacci et al
as 1:2010cv10147
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
John Baldacci, G. Steven Rowe, Mark Randlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudman et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv10130
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hudman, Kelvin Holley, Dana Duteau and others
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Robert Murphy and Justin W. Prario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. State of Maine
as 1:2010cv10010
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
State of Maine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. State of Maine et al
as 1:2009cv12228
Petitioner:
Carol Murphy
Respondent:
State of Maine and Michaela Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Middlesex Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2009cv11413
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Middlesex Sheriff's Office, Captain Page, Michael Centa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battista v. Murphy et al
as 1:2009cv11406
Petitioner:
Sandy J. Battista
Respondent:
Robert Murphy, David Brouillette, Roger Parent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
