Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Rath v. Marshall et al
as 1:2020cv01882
Petitioner:
Jacob Benjamin Rath
Respondent:
Jill Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wind v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Kate Knowles, Matthew Newcomer, James McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiras v. Marshall
as 1:2020cv00682
Plaintiff:
Skyler Chiras
Defendant:
Jill Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Sunday v. Marshall et al
as 1:2020cv00195
Petitioner:
Michael Rohn Sunday
Respondent:
Jacob R. Confer, Jill Marshall and Lennart Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Kirchner v. Marshall et al
as 1:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Law Offices of Rachel A. Oliver LLC, Miriam Stohs, Jill Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Dillon Kirchner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zuplco v. Jawovski et al
as 1:2019cv03708
Plaintiff:
Robert Zuplco, Jr. and Robert Zupko, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody Jawovski, Mathew Angoy, Noah Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bent County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2019cv02340
Plaintiff:
Rodney A. Smith
Defendant:
Colorado Dep't of Corrections, Bent County Correctional Facility, Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allman v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv02300
Defendant:
Petter C. McKittrick, S. Amanda Marshall, Arnot Stephen and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Allman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2019cv02308
Respondent:
No Named Respondents, B.O.P., Executive Director of Colorado Dept. of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
William D. Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Kirchner v. Marshall et al
as 1:2019cv01829
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Jill Marshall
Petitioner:
Jesse Dillon Kirchner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
