Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Hair v. Lake County Police Dept et al
as 2:2020cv00204
Defendant:
Winfield Police Dept, D Murchek, All Medical Departments and Staff of Lake Co. Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Terik D Hair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodnar v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00183
Plaintiff:
Steven George Bodnar, Steven Bodnar and Steven G Bodnar
Defendant:
All Jail Staff and Departments, Michael Zenk, Lake County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodnar v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Collins, Michael Zenk, Lake County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Steven G Bodnar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sellers v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Petitioner:
John Wesley Sellers, III
Respondent:
United States of America, State of Indiana, Oscar Martinez, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Martinez et al
as 2:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Darwish, Oscar Martinez and Michael Zenk
Plaintiff:
Justin Adam Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohnes v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv00117
Respondent:
United States of America, State of Indiana and Oscar Martinez Jr
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes
Defendant:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blassingame v. Wicks et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Giovoni Martinez and Wicks
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Blassingame
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohnes v. Martinez et al
as 2:2019cv00486
Respondent:
Oscar Martinez, Jr, O'Connor, Michael A Zenk and others
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Martinez et al
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Almeda Johnson, Oscar Martinez, Jr, Toth and others
Plaintiff:
Omarr Royale Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Zenk et al
as 2:2019cv00295
Defendant:
Oscar Martinez, O'Connor and Michael Zenk
Plaintiff:
Kervel Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
