Cases 41 - 50 of 276
Smith v. Western Missouri Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv06040
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Smith
Defendant:
Western Missouri Correctional Center, Michael Kimbrough, Bird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greathouse v. Barlett et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Greathouse
Defendant:
Benjamin M. Barlett, Matthew Kellison, Dale Broadwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGinness v. Lester et al
as 4:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. McGinness
Defendant:
Captain Orville Lester, Nurse Jamie Unknown, H. Deutch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Obi et al
as 2:2022cv04006
Plaintiff:
Rico Ricardo Paul
Defendant:
Noel Obi, Scott Kintner, Leonard Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greathouse v. Wilson
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Greathouse
Defendant:
Matthew Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Precythe et al
as 2:2021cv04244
Plaintiff:
Joseph Leroy Thompson
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michael Shewmaker, S Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Pemiscot County Jail
as 1:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anderson
Defendant:
Pemiscot County Jail, Matthew Walker and Josh Darnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enloe v. Krohn et al
as 2:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
James Enloe and Joshua James Enloe
Defendant:
Matthew M. Krohn, Brian Keedy, Kevin Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirley v. Family Dollar Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv06126
Plaintiff:
Charles Shirley
Defendant:
Family Dollar Corporation, Matthew D Grimmett and Ray Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac v. Price et al
as 4:2021cv00807
Defendant:
Arnold Perry, Matthew Pultz, C. Francis and others
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
