Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-56453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Office of the Governor, WILLIAM C. BEVERLY, Judge, the chief Law Officer, STEVEN R. YANSICKLEN, the successor in interest and others
Simmons v. Kernan et al
as 3:2017cv03809
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Respondent:
Scott Kernan, Kathleen Allison, C. E. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Kernon et al
as 1:2016cv07319
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
Scott Kernon, Kathleen Allison, C. E. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Warden at Pelican Bay State Prison
as 3:2016cv07320
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Respondent:
Warden at Pelican Bay State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. T. Sander
as 14-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
T. SANDERS
Simmons v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv01508
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
Greg D. Lewis, William C. Beverly, Jr., Ira Reiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. Greg D Lewis
as 2:2012cv00549
Respondent:
Greg D Lewis
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. George Giurbino, et al
as 11-16630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE GIURBINO, Director of Corrections of the State of California, GREG D. LEWIS, Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison, K. CRUISE and others
Simmons v. Giurbino et al
as 3:2011cv02169
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
George Giurbino, Greg D. Lewis, K. Cruise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. The United States et al
as 3:2011cv00866
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
The United States, Edmund Jerry Brown, Robert Moosy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
