Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Demos et al v. John Doe DOC Medical Director et al
as 4:2017cv05120
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr. and The Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
John Doe DOC Medical Director, Frank John Smith, Jon Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos et al v. John Doe DOC Medical Director et al
as 2:2017cv01079
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and The Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
John Doe DOC Medical Director, Frank John Smith, Jon Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. King County Jail
as 2:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
David A Moore
Defendant:
King County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2016cv01963
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Jensen
Defendant:
State of Washington, Jay R Inslee, Eugene J Medutis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05856
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Moore v. Seattle Police Department
as 2:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Michael James Moore
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Hammond et al
as 4:2016cv05067
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Cole
Defendant:
Steven Hammond, Jennifer Ambrose, Clifford Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luckett v. Moore
as 2:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Alvin Luckett
Defendant:
Melvin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rook v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv05033
Plaintiff:
Guy Adam Rook
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections, Dan Pacholke, Steven Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Hampton Manufacturing Incorporated
as 2:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
Joseph Neal
Defendant:
Hampton Manufacturing Incorporated, Ronald S Hampton, Sr., Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
