Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Muhammad v. New York State et al
as 6:2016cv06005
Plaintiff:
Prince divine Messiah Muhammad
Defendant:
New York State, Vincent Miccoli, Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Prince D.M. Muhammad
Defendant:
New York City and John Gleeson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. McCary et al
as 6:2015cv06750
Petitioner:
Prince Muhammad
Respondent:
Richard McCary and Philip Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNair v. Ponte et al
as 1:2015cv08477
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Jonathan Ortega, Mouhamet Cherry and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Carolyn Saunders, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02945
Defendant:
Warden Edmund Duffy and Warden Gumusdere
Plaintiff:
Mr. Prince Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. New York State et al
as 1:2015cv03353
Defendant:
Director Vincent Miccali, New York State and Dr. Sankerwich
Plaintiff:
Mr. Prince Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv05650
Plaintiff:
Prince Muhammad
Defendant:
New York City, Mary Bassett, Mental Health Lawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Rabinowitz et al
as 1:2015cv05651
Plaintiff:
Prince Divine Messiah Muhammad
Defendant:
Steve Rabinowitz, New York State, Vincent Miccoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv05603
Plaintiff:
Prince Divine Messiah Muhammad
Defendant:
New York City, The Commissioner of Mental Health, Vincent Miccoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv04033
Defendant:
Warden Edmund Duffy, Judge Matsumoto, New York City and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Divine Messiah Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
