Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Reynolds v. Clark et al
as 2:2012cv00748
Plaintiff:
John K Reynolds
Defendant:
Clark, Sean Dumas and N Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv05966
Plaintiff:
Thomas N Ball, Sr
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monschke v. Cross et al
as 3:2011cv05276
Petitioner:
Kurtis Monschke
Respondent:
James N Cross and Eldon Vail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. McIntyre et al
as 3:2010cv05917
Plaintiff:
William Curry, Jr
Defendant:
Kellie McIntyre, Adrian Johnson, Brian W Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Hoisington v. Williams et al
as 3:2009cv05630
Plaintiff:
Monte C Hoisington
Defendant:
Robin Williams, Susan N. Dreyfus, Henry Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv01233
Plaintiff:
Tam Minh Nguyen and Hoang Kim Vo
Defendant:
United States of America, US Department of Justice, Immigration Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv01547
Plaintiff:
Tam Minh Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lowden et al v. Miller-Stout et al
as 3:2008cv05365
Plaintiff:
Patrick N Lowden and Christi Lowden
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Eldon Vail and Washington State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2008cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Vernette Stowers, A Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
