Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Johnson, Salaam v. Board of Supervisors Legislative Personnel of Grant County, Boscobel, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Salaam Johnson
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors Legislative Personnel of Grant County, Boscobel, Wisconsin, Rick Raemisch , Peter Huibregtse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myron Edwards v. Peter Huibregtse
as 10-2402
Petitioner - Appellant:
MYRON E. EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER HUIBREGTSE, Warden
Bracey, Larry v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Larry Bracey
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , Peter Huibregtse , James Grondin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christensen, Jeremy v. Westfield, Daniel et al
as 3:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Christensen
Defendant:
Daniel Westfield , JUDITH HUIBREGTSE and Peter Huibregtse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derek Kramer v. Rick Raemisch, et al
as 10-2121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK S. KRAMER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, MICHAEL THURMER, WILLIAM POLLARD and others
Liebzeit, Jonathan et al v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2010cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Liebzeit and Derek S. Kramer
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , MICHAEL THURMER , William Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler, Sean v. Huibregtse, Peter
as 3:2010cv00128
Petitioner:
Sean B. Butler
Respondent:
Peter Huibregtse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghashiyah, Tayr v. Huibregtse, Peter
as 3:2010cv00172
Petitioner:
Tayr Kilaab Ghashiyah
Respondent:
Peter Huibregtse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lelinski v. Huibregtse
as 2:2010cv00108
Petitioner:
Steven J Lelinski
Respondent:
Peter Huibregtse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ceso Sprewell v. Peter Huibregtse
as 10-1260
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESO SPREWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER HUIBREGTSE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
