Cases 41 - 50 of 183
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2017cv00481
Petitioner:
PETER RAYMOND WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and SAMUEL S. OLENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. NASTASI et al
as 3:2016cv09521
Plaintiff:
LA'SHAWN JONES
Defendant:
PETER NASTASI and PROSECUTORS OFFICE NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09004
Plaintiff:
BRUCE W. PETERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLAH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv08791
Petitioner:
PETER KLAH
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOFAN JUNIOR v. PEREKSTA et al
as 3:2016cv08559
Plaintiff:
HENRY SAYE GOFAN JUNIOR
Defendant:
DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, THOMAS M. BROWN, EDWARD A. BELMOUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. RICCARDI et al
as 3:2016cv08260
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN A. RICCARDI, PETER E. WARSHAW, VERNON L. MCGOWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv08271
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, CHERYL ESPOSITO, PETER BRANCATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITHERSPOON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06070
Plaintiff:
PETER WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAROSA v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05784
Plaintiff:
PETER JOSEPH LAROSA, III
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAISI v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2016cv05064
Plaintiff:
HEMMINGWAY MUKORA SAISI
Defendant:
CAROLYN MURRAY, MICHAEL MARUCCI, MICHAEL A. PETROLLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
