Cases 41 - 50 of 133
Lawrence v. Prisoner Review Board
as 3:2017cv50240
Petitioner:
Lennox Lawrence
Respondent:
Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Butler et al
as 3:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
Eugene Horton
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Vonetta Harris, Jon Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavette v. Illinois Dept of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv05280
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavette
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Correction, Prisoner Review Board and J. Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath (ID 63392) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2017cv03114
Petitioner:
Glenn A. Heath
Respondent:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Prison Review Board and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Long (ID 38855) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2017cv03098
Petitioner:
Michael Ernest Long
Respondent:
Doug Waddington and Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Butler et al
as 1:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Eugene Horton
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Vonetta Harris, Jon Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv03330
Plaintiff:
Mickey Ball
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, Illinois Prisoner Review Board Chairman and James Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Wright et al
as 3:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert Hamilton
Defendant:
Jeff Wright, Robert Ley, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwayne Sandress v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board, et al
as 16-4110
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWAYNE SANDRESS, also known as MICHAEL JOSEPH, N61217
Respondent - Appellee:
ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD and NNEKA JONES TAPIA, Director, Executive Director, Cook County Jail
Vincent George, Jr. v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 16-3754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT M. GEORGE, JR., also known as George Vincent, also known as Abdul Alim Hajar
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of IDOC, WARDEN HODGES, JANIS JOKISCH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
