Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Dewald v. Gorske et al
as 3:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Bart Dewald
Defendant:
Lacey R Gorske and Debra Rose
Miscellaneous_party:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00409
Petitioner:
DONNIE A. ROSE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00032
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BERRY v. JAY, et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKETT BERRY and JAVON LANCE CROCKETT BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON INC and others
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. SMITH
as 2:2016cv00355
Petitioner:
KEVIN ROSE, SR.
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Underwood v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Underwood
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Sharon Hawk, Andrew Pazera and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Mize et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
JaVon Crockett Berry
Defendant:
Brent Mize, Keith Butts, Mr Willson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHTEN v. PERSON et al
as 2:2015cv00386
Defendant:
DOTSON, MONICA GIBSON, JESSICA HAMMACH and others
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY KNIGHTEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHERRY v. LEVINE et al
as 1:2015cv01766
Defendant:
COUNSELOR BALINGER, SERGEANT T. BOOKIN, OFFICER DAUGHERTY and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY WILLIAM CHERRY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv01697
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DANIEL ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
