Cases 41 - 50 of 1,317
Scott v. TDCJ Larry Gist Unit
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Andre Scott
Defendant:
TDCJ Larry Gist Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Zachius M Stevens
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly S Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. 188th County Court et al.
as 6:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
James Odom
Defendant:
188th County Court, Kim Sung and Judge Scott Novy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Jimmy Smith, Warden Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04293
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Scott et al
as 6:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Martinez
Defendant:
Shane Scott and Gary Pinkerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meals v. United States Of America;
as 2:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
Stephen Scott Meals, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Samuelson v. Masterson et al
as 4:2023cv01061
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Scott Masterson, Russ Authier, Officer FNU Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuelson v. Masterson et al
as 1:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Samuelson
Defendant:
Scott Masterson, Russ Authier, FNU Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
