Cases 41 - 50 of 444
Martin v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Davon Brashir Martin
Defendant:
Lt. Hamilton, Correctional Officer Rondal White, Correctional Officer Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. Arlington County Clerk et al
as 3:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Taylor
Defendant:
Arlington County Clerk, Register of Deeds, Wegmans Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babb v. Woody et al
as 7:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Babb
Defendant:
Lt. David W. Woody and Scott County VA. Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00517
Petitioner:
Jacob Scott Goodwin
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Scott
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bracy v. Briard
as 1:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Bracy
Defendant:
Major Scott Briard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Staunton Police Department
as 7:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Scott Coleman
Defendant:
Staunton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sourang v. Scott et al
as 1:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Mawloud Sourang
Respondent:
Charles Scott and G. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
