Cases 41 - 50 of 368
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sailem v. Ward
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Steven Sailem
Defendant:
Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03615
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEWIS SCOTT
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Defendant:
Steven Dupree, Eugene Sapp, Warden Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Deandre Walton, Steven Crowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven James Gomez v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02635
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Rachel Krause, Linda Borsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe, Yalondia Smith, Keyshia L. Bottoms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
