Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Farabee v. Clarke, et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Plaintiff: Brian Farabee
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, David Boehm, James W. Stewart, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farabee v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00076
Petitioner: Brian Farabee
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke and James W. Stewart, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Stewart, III
as 1:2011cv01263
Plaintiff: Charles R. Turner
Defendant: James Stewart, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verser v. Stewart, III et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00669
Plaintiff: David W. Verser
Defendant: James Stewart, III and Kimberly Runion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Stewart, III
as 1:2011cv01019
Petitioner: Jackie Lewis Robinson
Respondent: James Stewart, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McVey v. Runion et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00534
Plaintiff: James Lacy McVey
Defendant: Kimberly Runion, Commonwealth of Virginia and Jim Stewart, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Loams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00450
Defendant: Gene Johnson and Bush Loams
Plaintiff: John W. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Mahon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00242
Respondent: Warden Daniel T. Mahon
Petitioner: Anthony T. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Mahon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00207
Respondent: Warden Daniel T. Mahon
Petitioner: Anthony T. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Mahon
as 3:2010cv00313
Petitioner: Anthony T. Stewart
Respondent: Daniel T. Mahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?