Cases 41 - 50 of 83
EUBANKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06237
Plaintiff:
EDWARD EUBANKS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, F. MACK, RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. MASON et al
as 1:2016cv03922
Petitioner:
ARNULFO SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
L. MASON and DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWELL et al v. LOUGY et al
as 2:2016cv02603
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HOWELL, JESSIE J. PINCKNEY, ANTHONY T. DIXON and others
Defendant:
ROBERT LOUGY, TINA SPAGNUOLA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROTZMAN v. FICARRA et al
as 3:2016cv00619
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROTZMAN
Defendant:
BRIAN FICARRA, CHRIS LAVER, JAMES A. MACAULAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. ESSEX COUNTY
as 2:2015cv03391
Plaintiff:
LAZARO SANCHEZ
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv03266
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SANCHEZ
Defendant:
BARB SMITH and U.S.A. TODAY NEWS PAPERS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUDABUSH v. BITENER et al
as 1:2015cv03185
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
BITENER, MARCHANELLO, T. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2015cv01879
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANCHEZ
Defendant:
EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON, DR. AHMAR SHAKIR, DR. ELMIRA KAPCHITS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. CIDAMBI et al
as 2:2014cv07093
Plaintiff:
FRANK SANCHEZ
Defendant:
INDRA CIDAMBI and PATRICK MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
