Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Lomeli v. Shelton
as 5:2010cv02961
Plaintiff:
Albert Gonzalez Lomeli
Defendant:
Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton Weston v. Kathleen Allison
as 2:2010cv03506
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Petitioner:
Shelton Weston
Shelton v. Marshall et al
as 4:2010cv01100
Petitioner:
Joseph P. Shelton
Respondent:
John C. Marshall and Attorney General For The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Dickinson et al
as 2:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Clifford Johnson
Defendant:
Kathleen L. Dickinson, J. Holland and C. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hay v. California Prison Health Care Receivership Corp. et al
as 5:2009cv02373
Plaintiff:
Joe Vernon Hay, Jr
Defendant:
California Prison Health Care Receivership Corp., Robert Sillen, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony S. Hosendove v. San Bernardino County Sheriffs Dept
as 5:2009cv00779
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shelton Hosendove
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Sheriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Chris Myers et al v. Robert Haro et al
as 5:2009cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chris Myers, Dean Shelton, Rond Urbon and others
Defendant:
Robert Haro, Horlin Penn, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Chris Myers et al v. J. L. Norwood et al
as 2:2009cv01158
Plaintiff:
Chris Myers, Eric Houston, Tracy Terry and others
Defendant:
J. L. Norwood, Richard Boorn, F. Entzel-Shu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Gomez v. Brida et al
as 2:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Timoteo Gomez
Defendant:
Brida, Martinez, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shelton v. Marshall et al
as 2:2008cv03057
Petitioner:
Joseph P. Shelton
Respondent:
John C. Marshall and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
