Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Davis v. Attorney General of the State of Virginia et al
as 3:2012cv00531
Petitioner:
Ricky Glendall Davis
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Virginia and Donald E. Jeffrey, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Islam v. The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
as 1:2012cv00721
Petitioner:
Md. Tajul Islam
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. State Of Virginia et al
as 1:2012cv00400
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jesus Sanders
Defendant:
State Of Virginia, Christopher W. Hutton, John F. Haugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Dowdy et al
as 7:2011cv00570
Plaintiff:
James F. Clark
Defendant:
Norman Dowdy, K. Mike Fleenor, Jr., The State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al
as 1:2011cv01325
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
State Board of Elections of Virginia, Secretary of State of Virginia and State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jones v. The State of Virginia
as 1:2011cv01216
Petitioner:
Dontae Jones
Respondent:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
North v. Prosecutors Office et al
as 1:2011cv01164
Petitioner:
Kevin North
Respondent:
Prosecutors Office and State Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. State of Virginia et al
as 2:2011cv00457
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Martin
Defendant:
State of Virginia, Virginia Supreme Court and Norfolk Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. State of Virginia
as 1:2011cv00865
Petitioner:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al
as 1:2011cv00618
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
State Board of Elections of Virginia and Secretary of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
