Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Torres v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02738
Plaintiff:
Jaime Torres
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Sheriff of Fulton County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torres v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv02430
Petitioner:
Abraham Torres
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Torres-Rangel v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv01510
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Torres-Rangel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Rangel v. United States
as 1:2009cv01307
Petitioner:
Guillermo Torres Rangel
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv01189
Petitioner:
Induben Patel
Respondent:
Eric Holder, John P. Torres, James T. Hayes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Torres v. David
as 2:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Torres
Defendant:
Monica David
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzales v. Hickey et al
as 2:2008cv00130
Petitioner:
Ramon A. Torres Gonzales
Respondent:
Deborah A. Hickey and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Breland v. Camon et al
as 7:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
Ricky Breland, Jerome Cleggett and Bobby Seays
Defendant:
James Camon, Lt. Aikens, Ms. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Puckett et al v. Irwin County Detention Center
as 7:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
Luther Puckett, James Donaldson, Jose Arellano and others
Defendant:
Irwin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Torres v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00843
Petitioner:
Jaime Angel Torres
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
