Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Monson v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Eric Dean Monson
Defendant:
Utah State Hospital, FNU Holmes, FNU Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Utah State Prison et al
as 2:2016cv01229
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Daniels
Defendant:
Utah State Prison, Gary R. Herbert, FNU DaMill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Utah State Prison
as 2:2016cv01228
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Daniels
Respondent:
Utah State Prison and Third District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Utah State Prison et al
as 2:2016cv00324
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Allen
Defendant:
Utah State Prison, Scott Crowther, Erik Yorgason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Clark et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marcus Charles Melvin
Defendant:
FNU Clark, FNU Merille, FNU Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata v. Douglas et al
as 2:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Mata
Defendant:
Aaron Douglas, Utah State Prison, Alfred Bigelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Utah State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Richard Joey Garcia
Defendant:
Utah State Department of Corrections, Utah State Board of Pardons and Clark A. Harms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Needham v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Aaron David Trent Needham
Defendant:
State of Utah, Mark L. Shurtleff, John Swallow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacArthur v. Garden et al
as 2:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Bret Golden MacArthur
Defendant:
Richard Garden, Kennon Tubbs, Aaron Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Utah State Prison Inmate Accounting
as 2:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson
Defendant:
Utah State Prison Inmate Accounting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
