Cases 41 - 50 of 82
YOUNG v. EMBDEN et al
as 1:2017cv12046
Plaintiff:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Defendant:
LAURAN VAN EMBDEN and RICHARD T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. WARDEN SMITH
as 1:2017cv11644
Petitioner:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Respondent:
WARDEN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv05754
Petitioner:
NORRIS H. YOUNG
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv03039
Petitioner:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv03195
Petitioner:
VINCENT YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02924
Plaintiff:
ALAN D. GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, MAGGIE F. MOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDBERG v. YOUNG
as 3:2017cv02468
Plaintiff:
JAY R. GOLDBERG
Defendant:
KEVIN E. YOUNG, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07531
Plaintiff:
RONALD YOUNG
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07413
Plaintiff:
DERRICK YOUNG
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07015
Plaintiff:
GREGORY YOUNG
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
