Cases 501 - 510 of 24,643
Batts v. USA
as 3:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Kaylon M Batts
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Estes v. Hacker et al
as 2:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Donald Eric Estes
Defendant:
Hacker, Ridenour, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore et al v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Joshua Moore, James W. Clark, Jr., Dalmar Mack and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Gregory Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutton v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Kendrick Hutton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stewart v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Stewart
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Department of Corrections and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arzadon v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Sebastian William Arzadon
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. USA
as 2:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Jody W Compton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hopper v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Hopper
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing, Charles Ricket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North, Jr. v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jack Jay North, Jr.
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulkerson v. Williamson County et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Bryan Parke Fulkerson
Defendant:
Williamson County and f/n/u Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
