Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Medina v. Bechtel et al
as 1:2016cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jessica Maria Medina
Defendant:
Bechtel, Stickel and D. Mayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szabo et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2016cv07951
Plaintiff:
Jessica Szabo
Defendant:
Charles T. Rawley, City Of New York, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv07556
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Szabo et al v. Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Center et al
as 7:2016cv07293
Plaintiff:
Jessica C. Szabo, Dawn Dippell and Thomas Aikens
Defendant:
Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Center, NYS Office of Mental Health, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2016cv07223
Plaintiff:
Jessica-Maria Medina
Defendant:
Sabina Kaplan, Murphy, Wynam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szabo v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03683
Defendant:
City of New York, Janele Hyer-Spencer, Jane Does 1-11 and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Szabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szabo v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04268
Plaintiff:
Jessica Szabo
Defendant:
City of New York, Department of Corrections, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fate v. DuBois et al
as 1:2016cv01845
Plaintiff:
Forest Fate, Sr.
Defendant:
Carl DuBois, Ken Jones, Quality Choice Correctional Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeter v. CNYPC etc OMH et al
as 1:2015cv07040
Plaintiff:
Sharon Jeter
Defendant:
CNYPC etc OMH, Jessica French, Sal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv01800
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Defendant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., David Stuart, John Temples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
