Cases 51 - 60 of 265
Lowrey v. Wisch et al
as 4:2016cv01045
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pierce Lowrey
Defendant:
Scott Wisch and Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Tool City et al
as 6:2016cv01211
Plaintiff:
Scott Boatner Pierce
Defendant:
Tool City, Tool Police Department, Henderson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trejo v. Janssen Pharmaceutical Products LP et al
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Trejo
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutical Products LP, Texas Department of Health and Human Services, Dana Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Kaufman County District Attorney Office et al
as 3:2016cv02554
Plaintiff:
Scott Boatner Pierce
Defendant:
Kaufman County District Attorneys Office, Kaufman County, Adult Probation Office Kaufman County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Pierce
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00813
Plaintiff:
Donald Pierce
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover v. Collier et al
as 4:2016cv01632
Plaintiff:
Brian Hoover
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bill Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv01588
Petitioner:
Sherman W. Pierce
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pierce v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv01590
Petitioner:
Sherman W Pierce
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gianni v. Avila-Munoz et al
as 3:2016cv00143
Defendant:
Norma Avila-Munoz, Stanton Hawks, Dale J. Kersteen and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gianni
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
