Cases 51 - 60 of 510
Blunt v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv01492
Plaintiff:
Terrance Blunt
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trackling v. Hooper
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Keith Brewer
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Louisiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dugas v. Hooper
as 1:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Harry James Dugas
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guidry v. Hooper
as 6:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Miles Guidry and Miles J Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shurley v. Hooper
as 2:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Gary Shurley
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pegues v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Pegues
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Jeff Landry and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holder v. Hooper
as 5:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Holder
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathews v. Hooper
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Trevor A Mathews and Trevor Matthews
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pegues v. Hooper et al
as 3:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Pegues
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, Unknown Hardy, Unknown Rosso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
