Cases 51 - 60 of 665
Daniels v. Crall et al
as 0:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
John Larry Daniels and David W. WIlliams
Defendant:
Doug Crall, Federic Kemen, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tillie-Toler v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Richard William Tillie-Toler
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Omar S Williams
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Mabry et al
as 0:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Justin Davis
Defendant:
Judy Mabry, Latrisha Ferguson, Norah McGlone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillie-Toler v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Richard William Tillie-Toler
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Raynard Williams
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arnett v. Williams et al
as 5:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bobby Eugene Arnett
Defendant:
Steve Williams, Tina Dropik, Robin Amberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mazza
as 7:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Gerald Williams
Respondent:
Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melton v. Bright et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Rex Melton
Defendant:
Samantha Bright, William Mustage and Andrea M Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
